Heterogeneous mesh network and a multi-RAT node used therein

ABSTRACT

This invention discloses a heterogeneous mesh network comprised of multiple radio access technology nodes, wherein nodes can function dynamically, switching roles between client and server. Moreover, these nodes can operate in a heterogeneous fashion with respect to one another. In an alternate embodiment, the invention describes a mesh network comprised of nodes operating over TV white-space. This invention additionally discloses self-organizing network embodiments and embodiments that include novel methods of monitoring operational parameters within a mesh network, adjusting those operational parameters, and creating and implementing routing tables.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a division of, and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/889,631, entitled “Heterogeneous Mesh Network and a Multi-RAT Node Used Therein” and filed May 8, 2013, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of each of U.S. Provisional App. No. 61/705,440, entitled “Multi-Access and Backhaul Wireless Systems and Methods” filed Sep. 25, 2012; U.S. Provisional App. No. 61/784,002, entitled “Method of Dynamically Altering Operational Parameters of a Base Station,” filed Mar. 14, 2013; and U.S. Provisional Pat. App. No. 61/812,119, entitled “Heterogeneous Mesh Network and a Multi-RAT Node Used Therein,” filed Apr. 15, 2013, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

FIELD

The present application relates to mesh networks, wireless mesh networks, heterogeneous mesh networks, self-organizing networks, and methods of creating the same.

BACKGROUND

Mesh networks have existed on the fringe of the IT world since the early 1980's. See generally Power Source Online, Mesh Networks, Kristin Masters March 2010. http://www.powersourceonline.com/magazine/2010/03/mesh-networks. Recent advancements in wireless technology have promoted further exploration of applications for mesh networks; they hold extensive promise for rich applications such as sensor networks. Id.

Typically, a wireless mesh network operates in a homogeneous fashion, meaning that the nodes within the network share certain traits enabling communication between them. An example of this could be a wireless mesh network operating on a Wi-Fi protocol.

Before there were wireless communications, telephone calls were placed over wired infrastructure. For wired telephony, there were different wire-line protocols, e.g., ATM and TDM, that the telephone exchanges sought to connect. One way to interconnect these disparate networks was to create gateways that could bridge together the different networks. Although these gateways provided a bridge between networks, it is not always possible for a gateway to transparently connect different nodes from different networks without needing to emulate missing features on one network or to suppress unique features from another. This gateway paradigm has been used in wireless technology as well, one example being a personal Wi-Fi portable access point that connects to the Internet using a 3G or 4G cellular data connection.

Recently, some have studied the benefits of connecting heterogeneous mesh networks. For example, You, L. et al., noted “One of the key issues is networking, which means to interconnect lots of networks, such as internet, cellular networks, wireless sensor networks (ZigBee), wireless-fidelity networks (Wi-Fi), social networks, etc.” FHMESH: A Flexible Heterogeneous Mesh Networking Platform, You, L. et al, IEEE Sixth International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks, Dec. 20, 2010. This paper noted that finding an efficient way to interconnect these networks is an ongoing challenge in the Cyber Physical Systems field. Id. The authors of this paper designed a “platform utilize[ing] WMN technology to interconnect heterogeneous networks, and buil[t] gateways based on SDR technology.” Id.

Others who have sought to combine heterogeneous mesh networks have taken a similar tack. For example, heterogeneous interfaces for mesh networks typically consist of gateways that act as bridges between the two separate mesh networks. These gateways often employ Software Defined Radio “SDR” technologies. In effect, these gateways act as translators between the two disparate mesh networks. The individual nodes in the two disparate mesh networks, however, do not communicate directly with one another. They can only communicate via the gateway.

There are many benefits to creating heterogeneous mesh networks including increasing capacity without increasing costs. Increased capacity is desirable under many scenarios including in emergency situations such as the Sep. 11, 2001 attack on New York City, hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, and most recently, the Boston Marathon bombings. In the eleven-plus years that have transpired between the 9/11 events and the recent Boston Marathon bombing, there have been enormous advances made in wireless communications. Reliability and capacity have increased tremendously during that timeframe. But in emergency situations, cellular networks are still not able to handle the increased demand for telephone and data services.

“Toward the bottom of the list of disturbing aspects about Monday's bombing at the Boston Marathon was this: Cellular networks in the area almost immediately slowed down and, for periods of time, appeared to stop working altogether. Runners and their loved ones could not connect, and victims had trouble communicating with emergency responders. That frustrating scene has become familiar, evoking disasters from the September 11th attacks in 2001 to Hurricane Sandy in 2012. We rely on cell phones to run our lives, but they tend to be useless—or at least far from useful—when we need them most . . . . The science behind these failures in wireless connectivity isn't complicated. In every city, each mobile carrier operates hundreds or thousands of cell towers, which route calls and data to the carrier's backbone network. Each tower is designed to accommodate a set number of calls per second, per a certain geographic area. In a crisis, when everyone naturally reaches for their phone, that limit is quickly surpassed and the radios on the tower get sluggish. Mobile analyst Chetan Sharma, who estimates that a cell site can handle 150 to 200 calls per second per sector: ‘We've all had the experience of a fast-busy signal. That is the network telling you, “Sorry, but your cell is overloaded. There is no more space.’” Brad Stone, Why Cell Phone Networks Fail in Emergencies, Bloomberg Businessweek Technology, Apr. 16, 2013. http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-04-16/why-cell-phone-networks-fail-in-emergencies

In order to increase capacity and utilize all possible resources presently available, it is desirable to create a heterogeneous mesh network where the nodes themselves provide the heterogeneity. If, for example, in the minutes after the bombing at the Boston Marathon, traffic had been rerouted, not to user's designated backhaul locations, but instead to backhaul locations that were geographically further away, e.g., Cambridge, South Boston, or Chelsea, there would have been more backhaul available on these networks to facilitate data transmission. The present invention addresses this need.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention discloses a heterogeneous mesh network comprised of multiple radio access technology nodes. In this heterogeneous mesh network, nodes can function dynamically, switching roles between client and server or simultaneously acting as both client and server. Moreover, these nodes can operate in a heterogeneous fashion with respect to one another. In an alternate embodiment, the invention describes a mesh network comprised of nodes operating over TV white-space. The nodes of this white-space mesh network could, in alternate embodiments, operate in a heterogeneous fashion or could dynamically switch roles between client and server. These nodes could in alternate embodiments become multi access radio technology nodes.

This invention additionally discloses self-organizing network embodiments that can be implemented in the heterogeneous mesh networks or in a white-space mesh network. In the embodiments described herein, data within the network can become agnostic in terms of its protocol. As such, embodiments of the invention also include novel methods of monitoring operational parameters within a mesh network, adjusting those operational parameters, and creating and implementing routing tables.

In additional embodiments, this invention allows the creation of unique routing protocols, in part because of the agnostic nature of the data. These routing protocols can facilitate distributed computation of network topology and/or path determination. Specifically, when agnostic data are routed within the networks created herein, it is possible to use the transmission capabilities of the multi access radio technologies for data generated from, or destined to, a wide variety of radio communication protocols, frequencies, duplexing schemes, and the like. Accordingly, additional embodiments of the present invention include methods of routing data within a heterogeneous mesh network.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an illustration of an example multi-RAT node for deployment within a mesh network.

FIG. 2 is an illustration of an example heterogeneous mesh network of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is an illustration of the architecture of select layers of a device used within a mesh network described in various embodiments herein.

FIG. 4 illustrates examples of routing protocols that can be used in various embodiments described herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Although mesh networks have been deployed in the past, these networks have not contained nodes capable of: (1) operating on white-space frequencies; (2) dynamically switching roles; (3) autonomously using self-organizing network (“SON”) techniques; and (4) operating within a heterogeneous environment. The present invention, and embodiments described herein include systems, networks, apparatuses, and methods realizing these capabilities.

The embodiments of this invention differ conceptually from prior art gateway paradigms because the custom designed layer stacks of this invention abstract the protocols that make each radio technology unique, thereby creating an agnostic data set that can be seamlessly routed throughout a wireless network. In other words, in the embodiments described herein, we have created an adaptation layer that spans all MAC layers so that we can bridge between heterogeneous access layers. In embodiments of this invention, individual nodes operating on different protocols, different frequencies, different hardware manifestations, or different duplexing schemes can be part of a dynamic mesh network. This dynamic mesh network uses a single routing table for heterogeneous nodes contained within the mesh network.

Mesh Networks

The term “mesh network” is typically defined as a network comprised of two or more nodes wherein the nodes act as routers. Illustratively, an online encyclopedia from PC Magazine defines a mesh network as follows: “(1) [a] network that relies on all nodes to propagate signals. Although the wireless signal may start at some base station (access point) attached to a wired network, a wireless mesh network extends the transmission distance by relaying the signal from one computer to another . . . . (2) A network that provides Wi-Fi connectivity within an urban or suburban environment. It comprises ‘mesh routers,’ which are a combination base station (access point) and router in one device. Also called ‘mesh nodes,’ they are typically installed on street light poles, from which they obtain their power.” PC Mag.com Encyclopedia, http:www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/54776/wireless-mesh-network

Similarly, another online source states: mesh “networks rely on a series of nodes that transfer data wirelessly. Each node acts as an individual router, so the network can constantly reroute data to take advantage of the best pathways. It allows information to ‘hop’ from one node to another, circumventing blocked or broken paths in the network. Unlike other wireless networks, mesh networks use nodes that are all fully connected to one another, so the nodes are not mobile, but they can be easily configured to form ad hoc networks.” Power Source Online, Mesh Networks, Kristin Masters March 2010. http://www.powersourceonline.com/magazine/2010/03/mesh-networks

As used in this application, we define the term “dynamic mesh node” as a mesh node that is capable of playing a dynamic role within a network. A dynamic role could mean, by way of example, being capable of being a client with respect to one node and a server with respect to another node in the network. Dynamic can also mean switching radio access technologies. Prior art mesh nodes did not have the ability to play a dynamic role within a network. Rather, as can be seen from the above two definitions, mesh nodes acted as a base station access point and router. These roles were predetermined. The nodes within the mesh networks did not dynamically function as a client to one node, and a server to another, nor did they dynamically change transmit frequencies or protocols, for example.

Multiple Radio Access Technology (“Multi-RAT”) Nodes

The concept of multiple radio access technology will also be defined. The term “radio access technology” indicates the type of radio technology used to access a core network. Multiple radio access technology, or multi-RAT, is a radio technology capable of operating in varying parameters. These varying radio parameters could be, for example, different protocols, different duplexing schemes, wired versus wireless, disparate frequency bands, and the like.

By disparate frequency bands, we mean frequencies from different categories of standards, or from generally accepted frequency ranges for a given technology. For example, the Wi-Fi protocol standard is currently authorized for use at two different frequencies in the United States, 5 GHz according to the 802.1a standard and 2.4 GHz according to the 802.1b standard. However, the message format, media access method, etc. are identical regardless of the frequency used. Thus, in our lexicography, a device that could communicate using Wi-Fi at both 5 GHz and 2.4 GHz would not be a multi-RAT device or node because both of these frequencies are considered within the art to represent instances of the Wi-Fi protocol. An example of a radio capable of operating in disparate frequency bands would be a radio that could work in a Wi-Fi band of either 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz and that same radio could also operate at 700 MHz or any other cellular frequency band, which requires a different media access method and/or a different message format. This type of a radio is an example of a multi-RAT node.

Similarly, we use the term “heterogeneous mesh network” to mean at least two dynamic mesh nodes capable of: using different protocols, or different duplexing schemes, or operating in disparate frequency bands, or using different transmit/receive mediums, such as wired versus wireless. Different protocols may include Wi-Fi, 2G, 3G, 4G, WCDMA, LTE, LTE Advanced, ZigBee, or Bluetooth. Different duplexing schemes may include time division, code division, and frequency division schemes. Disparate frequency bands may include so-called “whitespace,” VHF and UHF channels, cellular telephony bands, public safety bands, and the like.

The multi-RAT nodes of the present invention have hardware, firmware, and software aspects. Focusing first on the hardware aspects, FIG. 1 shows hardware that could be used in embodiments of this invention. In an embodiment, a multi-RAT node 100 is comprised of at least one processor 110, access hardware 120, backhaul hardware 130, an RF front-end 140, and a timing source 150. By way of example, the at least one processor 110 could contain firmware written in Linux. Additionally, the RF front-end 140 can be configured to provide RF capabilities for multiple radio access technologies.

In one embodiment, the timing source could be GPS. Alternatively, the timing source could be derived from the Ethernet, or an IEEE 1588 source, such as SyncE, PTP/1588v2, and the like. In an alternate embodiment, wherein one multi-RAT node 100 may have access to GPS time, but another multi-RAT node 100 may be indoors, the two multi-RAT nodes 100 could use differential time synching techniques well known to those of skill in the art so that the indoor multi-RAT node 100 could sync its timing with that of the outdoor multi-RAT node 100. In another embodiment, the multi-RAT node 100 could be a dynamic multi-RAT node.

In alternate embodiments, the at least one processor 110, could be broken down into an access processor 112, a backhaul processor 114, a common processor 116, or any combination thereof. In this embodiment, the access hardware 120 is coupled to the at least one processor 110. In an alternate embodiment, having a separate access processor 112, the access hardware 120 could be coupled to the access processor 112, to the at least one processor 110, or to the common processor 116, or any combination thereof. Similarly, in another alternate embodiment, having a separate backhaul processor 114, the backhaul hardware 130 could be coupled to the backhaul processor 114, to the common processor 110, or to the common processor 116, or any combination thereof.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that access and backhaul hardware will vary depending on the access or backhaul protocol or frequency being used to perform access or backhaul. By way of example, if a particular multi-RAT node 100 was designed to perform access on LTE and Wi-Fi, it could have the radio access technology components that would perform access on these two different protocols. For LTE access, the access hardware 120 could be comprised of: a baseband processor and CPU cores for the firmware. The baseband processor could generate digital RF signals, which are modulated by the RF front end 140. These processors could be connected to the RF front end 140 via common public radio interfaces. Alternatively, some or all of the necessary radio access technology may incorporate Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) hardware/firmware devices, such as conventional Wi-Fi access hardware based on Atheros chips with embedded firmware and one or more external antennas.

Those skilled in the art will recognize that multiple hardware configurations could be used depending upon the access protocol, backhaul protocol, duplexing scheme, or operating frequency band by adding or replacing daughter cards to the dynamic multi-RAT node 100. Presently, there are off-the-shelf radio cards that can be used for the varying radio parameters. Accordingly, the multi-RAT nodes 100 of the present invention could be designed to contain as many radio cards as desired given the radio parameters of heterogeneous mesh networks within which the multi-RAT node 100 is likely to operate. Those of skill in the art will recognize that, to the extent an off-the shelf radio card is not available to accomplish transmission/reception in a particular radio parameter, a radio card capable of performing, e.g., in white space frequencies, would not be difficult to design.

Similarly, in the present invention, we describe how to make and use the inventions operating within well-known industry protocols. To the extent that additional protocols are adopted in the future, the teachings herein would be equally applicable. Additionally, if a person of skill in the art were to modify an already known protocol, such as LTE, and make it into a proprietary LTE protocol, for example, the teachings of this patent application would be equally applicable; and embodiments described herein could be adapted to accommodate this proprietary protocol.

Self-Organizing Network “SON”

Those of skill in the art will recognize that the term “SON” is a frequently used concept, but one that is devoid of a standard way of implementing the principles of self-organization that the moniker implies. As a result, SON embodies principles of self-organization, typically performed by those skilled in the art using proprietary architecture. Given that there are no true heterogeneous mesh networks to date, SON functionality, naturally, is being implemented on homogeneous networks.

In the present invention, because most of the mesh networks described herein are heterogeneous, it follows naturally that any SON implementations would be able to operate in a heterogeneous network. Against this backdrop, we use the term “SON” throughout this application to mean the traditional functionality of SON, i.e., self-organization, self-optimization, auto-configuration, self-healing, and the like, applied on a heterogeneous network as that term is used throughout this patent application. The SON principles described herein could also be used on the white-space embodiments discussed infra.

For illustrative purposes, we will describe SON functionality in an exemplary wireless mesh network 200 shown in FIG. 2. In this embodiment, multi-RAT node 210 is providing access on LTE, multi-RAT node 220 is providing access on Wi-Fi, and multi-RAT node 230 is providing access on 3G. In this embodiment, the multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, 230 could be using Wi-Fi backhaul. As such, this network 200 is a heterogeneous mesh network. In this heterogeneous mesh network, multi-RAT node 230 has a wired connection 235 to a computing cloud 240. Multi-RAT node 230 has a wireless connection 225 to multi-RAT node 220 and a wireless connection 217 to multi-RAT node 210. Additionally, multi-RAT node 220 has a wireless connection 215 to multi-RAT node 210. These connections are exemplary and could be altered in alternate embodiments. Additionally, heterogeneous mesh networks of the present invention could include more or less than the three exemplary multi-RAT nodes pictured in FIG. 2.

The SON architecture, discussed more fully with reference to FIG. 3, is distributed between a computing cloud 240 and the multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, 230. In one embodiment of SON functionality, the computing cloud 240 queries the multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, 230 regarding environmental conditions, e.g., interference, capacity, spectrum efficiency, routing path, network congestion, and the like. The multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, 230 respond by sending the requested parameters to the computing cloud 240. The computing cloud 240 processes these responses so that it can instruct the multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, 230 to change an operational parameter thereby better optimizing the performance of the heterogeneous mesh network 200. In these embodiments, operational parameters could be power level, channel, frequency band, spectrum reuse, as well as access, backhaul, client, or server, or routing paths.

In these embodiments, it is possible for a multi-RAT node 210, 220, or 230 to change an operational parameters because of the custom designed architecture 300 described infra. For illustrative purposes only, in one situation, the computing cloud 240 may determine that the heterogeneous mesh network 200 is experiencing interference. In response, the computing cloud 240 may instruct multi-RAT nodes 210 and 230 to reduce their power output.

In another embodiment, the multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, or 230 can also make decisions independent of the computing cloud 240 regarding whether to change an operational parameter because they also have custom designed architecture 300. In one of these embodiments, for example, the multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, or 230 could be pre-authorized to change channels if a certain interference threshold is crossed. Multi-RAT nodes could also contain the intelligence within their custom designed architecture 300 to be able to coordinate a handoff between them if one of their users is beginning to move into an area that would be better served by one of the other nodes in the network.

In another SON scenario, multi-RAT node 210 may be using its Wi-Fi radio for access and its LTE radio for backhaul. The computing cloud 240 may determine that multi-RAT node 210 is experiencing a backlog on the access side and that it could increase its efficiency by taking advantage of the greater downlink capacity built into the LTE standard. The computing cloud 240 could therefore instruct multi-RAT node 210 to dynamically switch roles, i.e., the LTE radio in multi-RAT node 210 should be used for backhaul and the Wi-Fi radio in multi-RAT node 210 should be used for access.

In similar embodiments, the computing cloud 240 could provide additional floating spectrum to one or more of the multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, or 230 to increase network capacity, to adhere to QoS requirement, to efficiently reuse spectrum, and the like.

In another embodiment, two multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, or 230 may be operating within close proximity to one another. For illustrative purposes, assume node 210 was servicing Verizon customers and node 220 was servicing AT&T customers. If multi-RAT node 210 reached a pre-determined capacity threshold, it could coordinate with multi-RAT node 220 to hand off some of its Verizon customers, who are operating in a different frequency band, to multi-RAT node 220. Multi-RAT node 220 could then provide service to customers of both Verizon and AT&T on two different frequency bands. Some of the criteria that could be used to determine if this type of frequency shifting among the multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, or 230 should occur are: (1) resource loads, e.g., DSP power, getting busy on one node; (2) one node may have better external resources, e.g., back-up power, wired backhaul, greater antenna height, optimum direction of antenna for a given coverage zone, and the like; and (3) similar key performance indicators that are well known in the art.

In this embodiment, once multi-RAT node 220 has been provisioned to provide services on two different frequencies, it must coordinate with multi-RAT node 210 by sharing information such as, traffic details, call details, RF quality measurements, and so forth. These nodes 210 and 220, which could be two or could be many, can add or remove frequency bands and can coordinate with each other to force user equipment handoffs to accommodate the change in the frequency scheme. In an alternate embodiment, the computing cloud 240 could manage the transfer of some Verizon customers to a multi-RAT node.

In another embodiment of this invention, a multi-RAT node 210, 220, or 230 may employ a method of increasing capacity by reducing its output power output thereby taking advantage of spectral reuse. In this embodiment, a multi-RAT node 210, for example, monitors its capacity. When it begins to reach a maximum capacity threshold, it could request permission from the computing cloud 240 to decrease its power output, thereby increasing capacity. Upon receiving this request, the computing cloud 240 could determine whether to grant the request. Some of the factors that the computing cloud 240 could take into consideration when making this determination are radio bearer utilization, QoS, operator policies, and capacity considerations of other multi-RAT nodes in the mesh network.

In this embodiment, once the computing cloud 240 reaches a decision regarding the request to decrease power, the computing cloud 240 informs the multi-RAT node 210 of its decision. If the request if granted, the computing cloud 240 directs the multi-RAT node 210 to prepare to handoff any UE sessions that will be in a coverage gap once it reduces its output power. Optionally, the multi-RAT node 210 could query UE on its network to obtain measurement reports of other multi-RAT nodes 220 or 230, for example, who may be able to absorb part of the coverage gap. In this embodiment, the multi-RAT node 210 could provide this information to the computing cloud 240.

Once the computing cloud 240 has directed the multi-RAT node 210 to prepare to handoff some UEs, it then directs one or more selected multi-RAT nodes 220 or 230 to increase its/their power, thereby increasing coverage. After the instructed multi-RAT node 220 or 230 has increased its power, it may update virtualization manager data with radio bearer capacity reduction information. The multi-RAT node 220 or 230 could then send the updated virtualization manager to computing cloud 240. After receiving this information, the computing cloud 240 virtualization manager may then direct the requesting multi-RAT node 210 to gracefully handoff in-progress UE sessions to other available multi-RAT nodes 220 or 230 in its neighborhood. Once the handoffs are completed, the requesting multi-RAT node 210 reduces its power to provide more capacity to UEs in its network. Optionally, this multi-RAT node 210 may update the virtualization manager with the resulting radio bearer capacity increase information and provide the updated virtualization manager to computing cloud 240.

In another embodiment of the present invention, a multi-RAT node 210, 220, or 230 in a mesh network may employ a method of increasing its coverage area by, for example, increasing power output. In this embodiment, a multi-RAT node 210 for example may monitor at least one network parameter and determine that a neighboring multi-RAT node 220 or 230 has ceased to function properly. After making this determination, the multi-RAT node 210 may contact the computing cloud 240 to report the malfunctioning multi-RAT node 220 or 230. The computing cloud 240 may then analyze the radio bearer utilization, QoS, operator policies and capacity considerations of other multi-RAT nodes 220 or 230 in the mesh. Using its measurements and internal logic, the computing cloud 240 could then determine if any of the multi-RAT nodes 220 or 230 within the mesh network can increase power output to provide more coverage.

In another embodiment, one of the multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, or 230 may, for example, be malfunctioning. In this embodiment, the computing cloud 240 could determine if one or more of the other multi-RAT nodes is able to fill the coverage gap caused by the malfunctioning node. The computing cloud 240 could coordinate with the functioning multi-RAT nodes so that at least one of them increases power, thereby extending coverage. After the coverage area has been extended, the multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, or 230 may update the virtualization manager with the resulting radio bearer capacity reduction information. Additionally, in this embodiment, the multi-RAT node(s) 210, 220, or 230 may have to handoff UE sessions in progress gracefully to other neighboring multi-RAT nodes in order to effectively extend coverage.

In alternate embodiments of this method, multi-RAT nodes may 210, 220, or 230 dynamically increase the transmit power of a single sector or multiple sector radio bearer based, for example, on Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) reports and/or location determination. This power adjustment may be performed in coordination with neighboring multi-RAT nodes, who correspondingly decrease their transmit power of the single sector or multiple sector radio bearer. A multi-RAT node 210, 220, or 230 may perform this functionality by directly communicating with neighboring multi-RAT nodes or in coordination with the computing cloud 240.

In an alternate embodiment, the multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, and 230 could operate on white-space frequencies. As those of skill in the art will recognize, using white-space frequencies for communication requires flexibility in terms of pre-selecting an operational frequency so as to avoid interference with other white-space devices. Because the white-space spectrum is unlicensed, it must be shared among potential users. In this embodiment, the multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, and 230 could use spectrum sensing techniques to determine which portion of the white-space spectrum is available for use. In an alternate embodiment, the multi-RAT nodes 220, 220, and 230 could query a database containing frequency availability based on location, time, and the like. This database could be stored within any or all of the multi-RAT nodes 210, 220, and 230, in the computing cloud 240, or in a remote location.

FIG. 3 shows a custom designed architecture 300 that can be used in embodiments of the heterogeneous mesh networks of this invention. Specifically, the custom designed architecture 300 of these embodiments builds upon the well-known Layer 1, Layer 2, Layer 3, Control Layer, Application Layer, and Management Layer architecture of the prior art.

In our custom designed architecture 300, we add an abstraction layer 340, a SON module 330, and in addition add customizations to the other modules so that they can interoperate with the abstraction layer 340 and the SON module 330. Specifically, our custom designed architecture 300 includes a management layer 380, an application layer 310, a control layer 320, and an abstraction layer 340. The abstraction layer 340 is communicatively coupled to at least one radio. For example, the embodiment of FIG. 3 shows three multi access technology radios. One of these radios is an LTE radio 370. One is a Wi-Fi radio 360. And the third is radio technology X 350. Once there are at least two radio access technologies within a single node, the node becomes a multi-RAT node as described herein. As can be seen from FIG. 3, additional radios 350 could be added to create multi-RAT nodes having X number of access technologies.

The abstraction layer 340 provides a common API interface to the layers above it. The abstraction layer 340 receives data from each of the radios beneath it and converts those data into protocol agnostic data. In some embodiments of the present invention, the SON module 330 interfaces with the SON portion of a computing cloud 240 in order to perform network optimization.

In terms of customization of the modules within the control layer 320, the traffic control module 325 has the flexibility to create data queues based on priority without regard to radio access technology. The automatic neighbor relation management module 326 acts as an interface between the multiple radio access technologies so that neighbors within a particular mesh network become aware of the various resources provided by each node within the network.

In some embodiments, the power management module 324 and/or the radio resource management module 322 can interface with the SON module 330 to increase or decrease power, to change channels, and the like in order to optimize network operating conditions.

For illustration, assume that the custom designed architecture 300 was operational on a multi-RAT node having two radio technologies, LTE 370 and Wi-Fi 360. In this embodiment, data could be received through the LTE radio 370. These data would be received in Layer 1 of the LTE radio 370. They would proceed up through Layer 2 and Layer 3 to the abstraction layer 340. The abstraction layer 340 would abstract the LTE-specific information from the data packet and would send a protocol agnostic data stream to the control layer 320. The control layer 320 would then decide the routing, which in this case could be through either the LTE radio 370 or the Wi-Fi radio 360. In embodiments of the present invention, multi-RAT nodes use and create distributed routing protocols that perform L2 bridging through an abstraction layer.

Additional embodiments of the present invention include novel routing protocols. In the prior art, routing was coupled to a specific operational parameter, e.g., protocol, duplexing scheme, wired versus wireless, or frequency band. In the present invention, routing is not tethered to these operational parameters because multi-RAT nodes participate within a mesh network with disparate operational parameters. The abstraction layer 340, in essence, creates agnostic data packets that can be routed through any of the multi-RAT nodes within a given heterogeneous mesh network.

In prior art mesh networks, nodes typically connected to adjacent peers. Referring to FIG. 2, adjacent peers could be 210 and 220, connected wireless via 215, and 220 and 230, connected wirelessly via 225. In embodiments of this invention, the nodes within a heterogeneous mesh network can have multiple connections such as multi-RAT node 230, which can connect to multi-RAT node 210 via connection pathways 225 and 215 or via connection pathway 217. In alternate embodiments of a heterogeneous mesh network, there could be more than three nodes as pictured in FIG. 2. In these embodiments, nodes that have multiple backhaul connections, e.g., multi-RAT node 230, could make dynamic decisions about the most effective connection paths for it to use at any given time. These decisions could be based on any of the environmental conditions discussed herein including, but not limited to interference, capacity, spectrum efficiency, routing path, network congestion, spectral reuse, throughput, latency, coverage gaps, signal-to-noise ratio, quality-of-service, spectral sensing for white space use, and the like.

In additional embodiments, this invention allows the creation of unique routing protocols, in part because of the agnostic nature of the data. These routing protocols can facilitate distributed computation of network topology and/or path determination. Specifically, when agnostic data are routed within the networks created herein, it is possible to use the transmission capabilities of the multi access radio technologies for data generated from, or destined to, a wide variety of radio communication protocols, frequencies, duplexing schemes, and the like.

FIG. 4 illustrates the concept of the mesh routing protocols in these embodiments. FIG. 4 depicts two multi-RAT nodes 410 and 420. In this exemplary embodiment, multi-RAT node 410 can operate on LTE and Wi-Fi, while multi-RAT node 420 operates over LTE, Wi-Fi, and 3G. When the multi-RAT nodes 410 and 420 exchange the mesh routing protocols, multi-RAT node 410 may place LTE data as priority 1 and Wi-Fi data as priority 2.

For purposes of illustration, we assume that, according to the current mesh routing table, multi-RAT node 420 acts as a relay node for multi-RAT node 410. In this example, multi-RAT node 410 transmits a data stream 430 containing data packets having different radio parameters. For example, data packets could be priority 1 data packets 432, LTE in this example, and priority 2 data packets 434, Wi-Fi in this example. When this data stream 430 is received at multi-RAT node 420, the packets within the data stream 420 retain their priority, but they are agnostic in terms of their radio parameters.

In a traditional mesh network, all of the multi-RAT nodes would have had the same radio parameters. Accordingly, when a routing node received a data stream, it would retransmit the packets on the same radio type as that of its neighbor, who originally transmitted the data packet. In the heterogeneous mesh network of the present invention, the multi-RAT nodes contained therein are capable of transmitting and receiving in a heterogeneous fashion. As such, multi-RAT node 420 can relay these data packets on any of its three available radio technologies, i.e., LTE, Wi-Fi, or 3G.

In this embodiment, a traffic control module 325 receives these data packets and provides a priority indicator to each of the packets within the data stream 430. The SON module 330 stored within multi-RAT node 420, or in alternate embodiments stored within the computing cloud 240, could queue these data packets to be retransmitted according to the priority that has been ascribed to each specific data packet. Specifically, when multi-RAT node 420 receives data stream 430, it can utilize all three of its radio access technologies for retransmitting the data stream 430. In one embodiment, multi-RAT node 420 could use its LTE radio transmit channel 440 for transmitting priority 1 data packets. It could use its 3G radio transmit channel 460 for transmitting priority 2 data packets. And it could divide the resources available from its Wi-Fi radio transmit channel 450 to transmit both priority 1 and priority 2 data packets.

This allocation of resources is fluid and is a function of time and network congestion, which is an environmental condition. If at a later point in time, priority 1 data packets became backlogged, the SON module 330 could alter an operational parameter such as using the 3G radio transmit channel 460 to transmit priority 1 data and maintaining the Wi-Fi transmit channel 450 as a shared resource for transmitting both priority 1 and priority 2 data.

Those of skill in the art will recognize that these radio resources could be used numerous different ways depending open things such as Quality of Service requirements including constraints on throughput and/or delay, subscriber agreements, network capacity, data congestion, efficient use of spectrum, and the like. Moreover, routing decisions could be made based upon environmental conditions such as: interference, capacity, spectrum efficiency, routing path, network congestion, spectral reuse, throughput, latency, coverage gaps, signal-to-noise ratio, quality-of-service, spectral sensing for white space use, and the like. Skilled artisans will also recognize that these decisions could be made by multi-RAT nodes, the computing cloud, or jointly between these devices.

The foregoing discussion discloses and describes merely exemplary embodiments of the present invention. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. Various components in the devices described herein may be added, removed, or substituted with those having the same or similar functionality. Various steps as described in the figures and specification may be added or removed from the processes described herein, and the steps described may be performed in an alternative order, consistent with the spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the disclosure of the present invention is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting of the scope of the invention, as well as other claims. The disclosure, including any readily discernible variants of the teachings herein, defines, in part, the scope of the foregoing claim terminology. 

The invention claimed is:
 1. A multi-radio access technology (multi-RAT) mesh network node comprising: a baseband processor; a first RAT interface, coupled to the baseband processor; a second RAT interface, coupled to the baseband processor; and a general-purpose processor coupled to the baseband processor, wherein the general-purpose processor is configured to communicate with at least one remote mesh network node to establish a mesh network, wherein the multi-RAT mesh network node is configured to designate either the first RAT interface or the second RAT interface as a backhaul interface for communicating with the remote mesh network node, wherein the multi-RAT mesh network node is configured to designate either the first or the second RAT interface as an access interface for providing radio coverage as a base station to, and for communicating to a wireless network operator core network on behalf of, at least one mobile device, wherein the multi-RAT mesh network node provides connectivity to a cloud coordination server to the remote mesh network node, and wherein the multi-RAT mesh network node is enabled to dynamically change the designation of the first RAT interface or the second RAT interface from the backhaul interface to the access interface, or from the access interface to the backhaul interface, based on receiving an instruction to change the designation based on a determination at the cloud coordination server.
 2. The multi-RAT mesh network node of claim 1, wherein the first RAT interface is a Wi-Fi mesh network interface and the second RAT interface is a Long Term Evolution (LTE) interface for providing LTE base station functionality to at least one mobile device.
 3. The multi-RAT mesh network node of claim 1, further comprising a timing source.
 4. The multi-RAT mesh network node of claim 1, further comprising a global positioning system (GPS) radio interface.
 5. The multi-RAT mesh network node of claim 1, further comprising a wired Ethernet network interface.
 6. The multi-RAT mesh network node of claim 1, wherein the general-purpose processor is configured to perform routing of network packets to and from the first and the second RAT interfaces.
 7. The multi-RAT mesh network node of claim 1, wherein the first RAT interface is configured to provide access to one or more mobile devices and the second RAT interface is configured to couple to the remote mesh network node.
 8. The multi-RAT mesh network node of claim 1, wherein the timing source is a global positioning system (GPS) radio interface.
 9. The multi-RAT mesh network node of claim 1, wherein the first and the second RAT interfaces provide access over at least two of: a 2.4 GHz frequency band; a 5 GHz frequency band; a 700 MHz frequency band; a television white space (TVWS) frequency band; a 3G cellular network frequency band; and an LTE cellular network frequency band.
 10. The multi-RAT mesh network node of claim 1, wherein the common processor is configured to perform synchronization of timing with the remote mesh network node.
 11. The multi-RAT mesh network node of claim 1, wherein the common processor and the baseband processor are located on discrete daughtercards coupled via a common bus.
 12. The multi-RAT mesh network node of claim 1, wherein the first and the second RAT interfaces are located on discrete daughtercards coupled via a common bus.
 13. The multi-RAT mesh network node of claim 1, wherein the multi-RAT mesh network node is configured to dynamically change the designation of the first RAT interface from the backhaul interface to the access interface, and to dynamically change the designation of the second RAT interface from the access interface to the backhaul interface. 